Older Job Seekers Gain Major Victory In Age Discrimination Case

AARP has led the fight for the rights of older workers in their relations with employers for decades, and in recent years has been building on its efforts to support older job applicants in their pursuit of career opportunities.

Last month, a federal court in Chicago delivered a major victory to older applicants. The case involved veteran attorney Dale Kleber, who faced a cutoff of seven years as a maximum experience for eligibility for a job he applied for.

Kleber, age 58, found himself searching for a new job after a long, successful career as an attorney. He applied to a "senior counsel, procedural solutions" position at CareFusion Corp. that solicited applicants with "no more than 7 years of experience," despite the position's description as a complex, interesting job with a great deal of autonomy.

Through his counsel, attorneys at AARP Foundation and a local Chicago attorney, Kleber brought an age discrimination suit, arguing that the seven year hard experience cap effectively weeded out all older applicants – a "disparate impact," claim. “Disparate impact” refers to seemingly neutral actions that have a disproportionate negative effect on a particular group, and in this case older applicants. But the trial court ruled against Kleber, and in the meantime, another federal court of appeals (the Eleventh Circuit) ruled that job applicants can never bring disparate impact claims under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA).

Last month, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals said otherwise, holding in an exceptionally thorough opinion that the statute's text and purpose do allow older applicants like Kleber to challenge job requirements that unfairly weed out older workers even if those requirements don't state that they are age-based.

This major victory for older jobseekers is the first decision of its kind at the federal appellate level. It is also likely to end up in the Supreme Court eventually, as the courts of appeals have split. CareFusion has also filed a petition asking the full court—not just the three-judge panel that initially issued the decision—to rehear the case.

In the meantime, AARP Foundation Senior Attorney Dara Smith said the recent decision “upholds the letter and spirit of the ADEA by preserving the full range of protections Congress intended for older job applicants facing numerous barriers to finding work.”

In the News:

Search AARP Blogs

Related Posts
March 26, 2019 01:51 PM
Technology holds great promise in addressing the needs of older adults as they focus on remaining healthy, active, socially connected and independent. To understand their behavior around adopting tech products, the Consumer Technology Association (CTA) and the CTA Foundation surveyed older adults and caregivers and found a deep interest among the group to embrace tech that promises greater convenience, safety and health.
March 25, 2019 02:24 PM
Skyrocketing prescription drug prices have been a major, ongoing concern for many Americans, particularly older Americans. A new AARP survey confirms this: 72 percent of adults age 50 and older said they’re worried about being able to afford their medications. Seniors are especially vulnerable to rising drug prices because they take an average of 4.5 prescription drugs each month. In 2015 alone, Medicare beneficiaries spent nearly $27 billion in out-of-pocket costs for their prescription drugs.
March 19, 2019 01:50 PM
AARP recently won a prominent " Sharecare Award" for its video spotlighting men as family caregivers, raising attention to an often hidden but vitally important group of people. Co-produced with AARP Studios, the 3-minute video offers an inside look at a gathering of African-American men from Philadelphia who support one another and openly share their unique challenges.