Work Requirements in Arkansas and Kentucky Blocked by Federal Court

Legal office of lawyers, justice and law concept : Wooden judge gavel or a wood hammer and a soundboard used by a judge person on a desk in a courtroom with a blurred brass scale of justice behind.
Getty Images/iStockphoto

On March 27, 2019, a federal judge for the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia issued decisions that are vitally important for Medicaid beneficiaries. The two cases, Gresham v. Azar and Stewart v. Azar, halted efforts in Arkansas and Kentucky to condition receipt of Medicaid benefits on securing work or volunteer activities, as well as other cuts to coverage. The court’s rulings reinforced an earlier decision against Kentucky’s work requirement and extended a similar reasoning to the Arkansas requirement.

In making its ruling, the court reaffirmed its prior holding that the federal government cannot approve changes to state Medicaid programs that are not consistent with the central objective of the Medicaid program—to furnish medical assistance to low-income people and people with disabilities. To provide a better understanding of the court’s decision, background on each state’s work requirement is discussed below:

Arkansas’s Work Requirement

Arkansas began requiring Medicaid beneficiaries to work or participate in volunteer activities in June 2018. Although certain groups are exempt from the requirement, those who are subject to it face harsh consequences for noncompliance or for failure to report compliance. People who have not met the work requirement in Arkansas have been disenrolled from Medicaid for the remainder of the year and are not permitted to reapply until the following year. Since the work requirement took effect, more than 18,000 Arkansans have lost Medicaid coverage, and along with it, access to critical health care and needed long-term services and supports.

Kentucky’s Work Requirement

The federal government approved Kentucky’s first request to impose a work requirement in Medicaid on January 12, 2018. The requirement was challenged in federal court and struck down in June of 2018 because the court determined that the federal government did not consider whether the state’s work requirement would help the state to furnish medical assistance as required by the Medicaid statute. The ruling effectively blocked Kentucky from implementing its work requirement. Within months of the court’s decision, the state once again sought and gained federal approval to advance a work requirement and other cuts to coverage. In seeking permission to require Medicaid beneficiaries to work, the state estimated that 95,000 would lose coverage if the requirement was implemented. Unlike, Arkansas, the state was not allowed to implement changes to its Medicaid program because of the June 2018 ruling, sparing beneficiaries from losing needed coverage.

What’s Next for Work Requirements?

For now, Arkansas and Kentucky will not be allowed to move forward with their work requirements. It is unclear what this means for people who have already lost coverage in Arkansas. Kentuckians fare better because the state’s waiver was never implemented.

The ruling is certain to be appealed. In the meantime, six more states have federal approvals to move forward with work requirements and ten states are waiting for approvals. It remains to be seen whether the federal government will come up with a new rationale on which to base continued approval of work requirements and other cuts to coverage.

While today’s news is encouraging, we will continue to monitor states that have approvals to impose work requirements. If those states press on to implementation, it will be critical to monitor how the requirements impact beneficiaries in terms of coverage losses and the negative health outcomes that result from such losses.


Lynda Flowers is a Senior Strategic Policy Advisor with AARP






Jean Accius is Vice President for the Long-Term Services and Supports & Livable Communities Group in the AARP Public Policy Institute







Kelly Bagby is Vice President for Litigation on Health, Housing, and Human Services, AARP Foundation






Search AARP Blogs
Related Posts
February 25, 2019 09:23 AM
Importing Age-friendly Innovations Blog Series
February 21, 2019 01:15 PM
As 2019 gets underway in full force, legislatures in states across the nation are convening -- some for a few weeks, others for another year-round session. How can we compete for and win the attention of state legislators and draw their focus to aging, disability, and long-term services and supports (LTSS) issues? The LTSS Scorecard is the best tool we have. Every advocate should become familiar with it, particularly with where their state stands compared to others, and visit their state capitol – early and often - with the Scorecard in hand.
February 20, 2019 11:10 AM
Medicaid is a crucial program for millions of people. But not everyone understands who’s eligible and the benefits; moreover, the program continues to evolve. Here’s what you and all consumers should know.